IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 23RD VAISAKHA, 1944 BAIL APPL. NO. 3599 OF 2022 CRIME NO.80/2021 OF ALAKKODE EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, KANNUR PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
SURESH K.S AGED 48 YEARS S/O SREEDHARAN, KUNNEL (H), MADHUVANAM, UDAYAGIRI AMSOM, NADUVIL DESOM, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN – 670 582 BY ADV B.MUHAMMED SHAHEEL RESPONDENT/STATE:
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 BY ADV SRI T.R. RENJITH, SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Dated this the 13th day of May, 2022 Regular bail plea of the sole accused in crime No.80/2021 of Excise Range OfÏce, Alakkode is under consideration in this petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor in detail.
3. The allegation of the prosecution is that on
19.05.20021 at about 16.30 hours, the Excise party seized 130 litre of wash kept near by the house of the accused, for the purpose of brewing alcohol and crime alleging commission of offence under Section 55(g) of the Kerala Abkari Act was registered. But the Excise party could not arrest the accused and after filing charge, the accused surrendered himself before the Magistrate court and sought for regular bail and the bail application was dismissed by the court concerned.
4. While canvassing regular bail to the petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued to convince that the petitioner is innocent and also to appraise that the recovery itself is from the neighbouring property of the petitioner and the petitioner has no nexus with the contraband seized. He submitted further that after filing final report, the petitioner voluntarily surrendered and sought for bail and was rejected. According to him, further custody of the petitioner in this case, where final report already filed, is not necessary and the petitioner is a first time offender. 5. The learned Public Prosecutor placed documents forming part of the case diary and opposed bail, highlighting huge quantity of wash involved in this case. However, the learned Public Prosecutor conceded the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
In this matter, the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and the final report already filed. Therefore, there is no reason to detain him in custody further for any purpose. In view of the matter, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner on the following conditions:
i. The petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing bond for Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties, each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
ii. The petitioner shall co-operate with the trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.