HIGH COURT OF KERALA
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
K.M.BASHEER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. addressing anticipatory bail under sc/st act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. issues formulated for jurisdictional clarity. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. observations from precedents regarding anticipatory bail. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. legislative intent for exclusivity of special courts. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
ORDER
This court is called upon to resolve an apparent incongruity in the matter of grant of anticipatory bail to those alleged to have committed offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'the SC/ST Act'). When the said statute provides an absolute prohibition on the applicability of the provisions of section 438 of Cr.P.C, the Supreme Court had, inPrathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India and Others [(2020) 4 SCC 727] observed that if the complaint does not make out a prima facie case for applicability of the provisions of the SC/ST Act, the bar created by section 18 and section 18A(1), shall not apply. The difficulty arises as to the forum where the absence of prima facie case can be agitated. The difficulty is compounded by the observations in the aforenoted judgment coupled with the creation of Special Courts and the conferment of app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.