SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 29603

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M/S. SHADOW DESIGNERS – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (WORKS CONTRACT) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dated this the 13th day of October, 2022 The petitioner suffered Ext.P2 order of assessment under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for the year 2016-17. The petitioner filed an appeal before the First Appellate Authority who by Ext.P4 order affirmed the order of assessment. The petitioner filed Ext.P5 appeal before the Appellate Tribunal along with Ext.P6 application for condonation of delay and Ext.P7 application for stay. While the matter is pending before the Appellate Tribunal, the petitioner has faced with Ext.P8 proceedings under the Revenue Recovery Act as well as Ext.P9 Prohibitory order issued under the provisions of Revenue Recovery Act.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner has a very good case to be argued before the Tribunal as the issues which were the subject matter of Ext.P2 were also the subject matter of appeal before the First Appellate Authority for the assessment year 2015-16 and by Ext.P3 order, the matter has been remanded for consideration of the assessing authority. It is submitted that though the issues arising for the year 2016-17 were also identical, the First Appellate Authority affirmed the order thr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top