SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 52659

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A.J ANNNAKUTTY. – Appellant
Versus
INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (IB) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Petitioner applied for the benefit of the Amnesty Scheme-2020, in respect of the arrears arising under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, by filing a declaration as contemplated by the Scheme and within the cut of date prescribed by the Scheme. The petitioner has been found ineligible for Amnesty through Ext.P17, on the ground that Ext.P3 appeal in respect of the assessment year 2005-06 is pending consideration before the Appellate Tribunal, at the instance of the Revenue.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the declaration made by the petitioner under the provisions of the Amnesty Scheme-2020 was initially accepted through Ext.P16. It is submitted that, later through Ext.P17, which is a communication issued to the Law Officer by the Assessing Authority (with copy to the petitioner) it has been stated that the declaration made by the petitioner under the Amnesty Scheme- 2020 cannot be processed on account of the fact that Ext.P3 appeal for the assessment year 2005-06, at the instance of the Revenue, is pending consideration before the Appellate Tribunal. It is submitted that Ext.P17 communication is contrary to the provisions of the Amnesty Scheme-2020

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top