SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 46249

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Ziyad Rahman A. A, J
KANAKARAJAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
K.RAKESH, M. P. PRASHANT- PP

O R D E R

The petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No.842/2020 of Perinthalmanna Police Station which was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 , 420 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ) and also under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 . The offence under Section 21 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act was also alleged.

2. The petitioner was arrested in connection with the aforesaid crime, and as per Annexure A order, statutory bail was granted to the petitioner under Section 167 (2) of Cr.P.C. However, in Annexure A order, the petitioner was directed to deposit an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- as one of the conditions for bail. The petitioner challenges Annexure A order in this Crl.M.C to the extent of imposition of the said condition.

3. Heard Sri.K.Rakesh, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.M.P.Prashanth, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

4. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that, the condition directing the petitioner to deposit an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- is onerous and is unwarranted. It is also contended

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top