SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 51096

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P. G. Ajithkumar, JJ
JAMALU P.V. – Appellant
Versus
PRAMESWARAN @ UNNI – Respondent


O R D E R

Ajithkumar, J.

This is a rent control revision under Section 20 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The 3rd respondent in R.C.P.No.54 of 2017 before the Rent Control Court (Munsiff), Ponnani, is the revision petitioner. In the rent control petition filed by the 1st respondent, who is the landlord, sought for eviction under Sections 11(2)(b), 11(3), 11(4)(i), 11(4)(ii) and 11(4)(v) of the Act. Eviction was ordered under Sections 11(2), 11(3) and 11(4)(i) of the Act. The petitioner herein preferred an appeal as R.C.A.No.24 of 2019 before the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Additional District Judge), Tirur, under Section 18(1)(b) of the Act, but it failed. Hence, this revision petition.

2. The 1st respondent did not file an appeal, whereby dismissal of the eviction petition as regards claim under Section 11(4)(ii) and 11(4)(v) has become final. Therefore, the matters relevant for consideration are relating to the grounds for eviction under Section 11(2)(b), 11(3) and 11(4)(i) of the Act.

3. The 1st respondent let out the petition schedule building to respondent Nos.2 and 3. They, in the name of a partnership firm, were conducting a hotel in the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top