HIGH COURT OF KERALA
GOPINATH P, J
SAJEEVAN – Appellant
Versus
THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – Respondent
WP(C) 36505/2022
Securitisation - Loan Recovery - SARFAESI Act - Section unspecified - The court interpreted provisions under the SARFAESI Act, allowing for installment repayments for overdue amounts and temporary cessation of coercive actions, emphasizing the need for balance between lender rights and borrower opportunities.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenges proceedings under the SARFAESI Act for loan recovery, seeking a chance to repay overdue amounts in installments to regularize the loan account.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner could be granted an installment repayment opportunity, allowing the loan account to be regularized if the overdue total is paid within the specified installments.
Issues: Whether the petitioner can be allowed to repay overdue amounts in installments and regularize the loan account without being subject to coercive recovery actions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that flexibility in repayment promotes the balance of justice and prevents undue financial distress on the borrower while also securing lender interests.
Final Decision: The court allows repayment of overdue amounts in installments and regularizes the loan account if terms are met.
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court challenging proceedings initiated under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI Act) for recovery of the amounts due upon a loan availed by the petitioner.
2. During the course of hearing, petitioner has confined the relief to an opportunity for repaying the overdue amount in installments and to obtain regularization of the loan account.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank submits that the term of the loan is said to be expired on January 2025. It is submitted that the present overdue amount itself is Rs.49,76,844/- (Rupees Forty Nine Lakh Seventy Six Thousand Eight Hundred and Forty Four Only) as on 21-12-2022. It is submitted that despite the assertion of the petitioner there is no One Time Settlement Scheme is now in operation and therefore the benefits of OTS cannot be extended to the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner is a recalcitrant defaulter. It is further submitted that the Bank has no objection in accepting the overdue amount in installments along with regular installments/EMI’s payable by the petitioner.
4. I have heard Adv. Nimmy Johnson, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Adv. P.C.Sasidharan, the learned counsel for the respondent.
5. Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the situation now prevailing, apart from the submissions made as recorded above, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted an opportunity to repay the overdue amount in 15 installments and thereafter, if the amount so directed is repaid within the time as directed above, to have the loan account regularized.
6. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent bank to accept repayment of the entire overdue amount of Rs.49,76,844/- (Rupees Forty Nine Lakh Seventy Six Thousand Eight Hundred and Forty Four Only) along with bank charges from the petitioner and regularize the loan account of the petitioner on the following conditions:
(i) The overdue amount of Rs.49,76,844/- (Rupees Forty Nine Lakh Seventy Six Thousand Eight Hundred and Forty Four Only) shall be repaid in 15 equated monthly installments along with any accrued interest and costs;
(ii) The first installment shall be paid on or before
16-01-2023. The subsequent installments shall be paid on or before the 16th day of the succeeding months;
(iii) Petitioner shall continue to pay the regular installments/EMI’s along with the installments as directed above;
(iv) In the event of default of any one installment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with law.
(v) In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts, all coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance.
It will also be open to the petitioner to seek for the benefit of OTS, if any new scheme for OTS is introduced by the respondent Bank.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.