Back
2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 53074
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. Muhamed Mustaque, Shoba Annamma Eapen, JJ
STATE OF KERALA – Appellant
Versus
K. JAYARAJ – Respondent
LA.App. 824 2014
BY SMT.N.SUDHADEVI, GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.A.JALEEL, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL
The court affirmed that land classification and comparable sales are crucial for determining fair compensation under land acquisition laws.
Headnote:
Compensation - Land Acquisition - Kerala Land Acquisition Act, 1961 - Sections 23(1A), 54 - The court evaluated the classification of acquired lands and enhanced compensation based on market value, determining adequacy according to local property values, while emphasizing the importance of comparable sales documents.
Fact of the Case:
The State and claimants appealed against compensation awarded for lands acquired for road widening, with the Reference Court setting varied compensation amounts that both parties contested.
Finding of the Court:
The court upheld the classification of lands as garden lands, agreeing with the Reference Court's enhancement of compensation, but refixed it to Rs.4,50,000 per cent based on a comparative analysis of local property values and significance.
Issues: Whether the Reference Court correctly classified the lands and if the compensation awarded was adequate and reasonable.
Ratio Decidendi: The classification of land and its market value directly influence compensation; evidence from comparable sales determines fair compensation under the Land Acquisition Act.
Final Decision: The court adjusted compensation to Rs.4,50,000 per cent with additional statutory benefits.
J U D G M E N T
Shoba Annamma Eapen J :
These Land Acquisition Appeals are filed under Section 54 of the Kerala Land Acquisition Act,1961 in respect of lands acquired for the purpose of widening of Kovoor-Vellimadukunnu Road, which is a project under Kozhikode City Road Improvement Project as per Notification :-2-:
dated 08.07.2010. Challenging the enhanced compensation awarded in Land Acquisition Reference cases and dissatisfied with the compensation awarded, the State as well the claimants are in appeal. LAA Nos. 63/2018, 275/2015, 300/2015, 321/2015, 345/2015, 365/2015, 367/2015, 384/2015, 433/2015, 434/2015, 435/2015, 438/2015, 439/2015, 446/2015, 447/2015, 453/2015, 462/2015, 13/2017, 28/2017, 513/2015, 51/2017, 68/2017, 105/2017, 198/2017, 278/2017, 285/2017, 793/2013, 179/2014, 180/2014, 200/2014, 210/2014, 217/2014, 111/2016, 245/2014, 250/2014, 279/2014, 294/2014, 300/2014, 301/2014, 310/2014, 194/2016, 319/2014, 196/2016, 206/2016, 209/2016, 335/2014, 338/2014, 343/2014, 356/2014, 357/2014, 234/2016, 260/2016, 266/2016, 267/2016, 275/2016, 286/2016, 287/2016, 291/2016, 292/2016, 293/2016, 421/2014, 429/2014, 454/2014, 455/2014, 459/2014, 461/2014, 462/2014, 463/2014, 468/2014, 472/2014, 362/2016, 365/2016, 370/2016, 371/2016, 497/2014, 374/2016, 504/2014, 380/2016, 381/2016, 382/2016, 507/2014, 383/2016, 509/2014, 386/2016, 515/2014, 521/2014, 526/2014, 534/2014, 412/2016, 415/2016, 416/2016, 417/2016, 420/2016, 423/2016, 424/2016, 579/2014, :-3-:
586/2014, 591/2014, 600/2014, 602/2014, 613/2014, 703/2014, 713/2014, 721/2014, 722/2014, 724/2014, 729/2014, 739/2014, 747/2014, 792/2014, 794/2014, 796/2014, 797/2014, 799/2014, 800/2014, 809/2014, 810/2014, 812/2014, 813/2014, 814/2014, 815/2014, 816/2014, 817/2014, 819/2014, 820/2014, 821/2014, 822/2014, 823/2014, 824/2014, 828/2014, 831/2014, 832/2014, 833/2014, 835/2014, 842/2014, 843/2014, 844/2014, 846/2014, 847/2014, 848/2014, 849/2014, 850/2014, 851/2014, 856/2014, 857/2014, 859/2014, 871/2014, 893/2014, 898/2014, 913/2014, 261/2016 are filed by the State challenging the enhanced compensation, Cross Objection Nos.121/2014 in LAA No.335/2014, 148/2022 in LAA No.454/2014 and 17/2022 in LAA No.429/2014 are filed by the claimants and LAA Nos..692/2013, 693/2013, 694/2013, 701/203, 702/2013, 344/2016, 397/2017 and 398/2017 are filed by the claimants, dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the Reference Court.
2. We have heard Smt.N.Sudhadevi, learned Special Government Pleader (Land Acquisition) appearing for the State of Kerala, Sri.K.A.Salil Narayanan, the learned Counsel appearing for the :-4-:
appellants in L.A.A.Nos.701/2013,702/2013,692/2013,693/2013 and 694/2013, Sri.R.Bindu (Sasthamangalam), the learned counsel appearing for the appellants in L.A.A.No.344/2016, Sri.Vinod Singh Cherian, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants in L.A.A.Nos.397/2017 and 398/2017, Sri.A.V.M.Salahudin, the learned counsel appearing for the cross objector in C.O.No.121/2014 in L.A.A.No.335/2014 and Sri.V.N.Ramesan Nambisan, the learned counsel appearing for the cross objectors in C.O.No.148/2022 in L.A.A.No.454/2014 and C.O.17/2022 in L.A.A.No.429/2014.
3. LAA No.815 of 2014 is treated as the main case. These cases have come up in batches totaling to 162 appeals including cross objections. The properties involved in all these appeals arise out of the same notification and are adjacent properties, acquired for the very same purpose. Hence we have heard the appeals together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. LAA No.815/2014 (LAR No.82/2011) is treated as the leading case and the evidence in this case consists of oral testimony of AW1, Exts. A1 to A3, Ext.R1 to R6 and Ext.X1 and X2.
:-5-:
4. Properties in Sy.Nos.19/9,19/11,19/13,19/15,19/17,19/19, 19/21,20/5,20/7,20/9,20/12,23/15,23/16,23/18,23/22,23/26,122/4,122/5, 213/4,213/7,214/4,214/14,159/4,194/2,226/5,230/8,230/10,230/11,232/ 5,234/6,234/8,234/9,234/11, 234/12, 234/13, 234/14, 236/9, 328/11,328/13,328/17,
