HIGH COURT OF KERALA
S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, SHAJI P.CHALY, J
CHEMMALA ASSAINAR HAJI – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB COLLECTOR, PERINTHALMANNA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 16th day of March 2022 Shaji P. Chaly, J.
The writ appeals are preferred against the common judgment of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C)Nos.3808/16 and 12664/16 respectively whereby, the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petitions holding that since the Malabar Land Registration Act , 1895 is repealed by Ordinance No.18 of 2005 dated 3rd December 2005, the applications submitted by the writ petitioners to register their lands in terms of Act, 1895 cannot be granted and therefore, the impugned orders passed by the statutory authority are in accordance with the law. The writ petitioner in W.P.(C)No.3808/16 has sought to quash Ext.P9 order dated 5.1.2016 issued to the petitioner under Right to Information Act whereby the petitioner was informed that the , 1895 is repealed by the ordinance as specified above and therefore, further action in the application submitted by the petitioner can only be done as per the directions of the Government in the matter. In W.P.(C)No.12664/16, the petitioner/appellant has sought to quash Exts.P6, P7 and P8 orders dated nil, 10.8.2015 and 8.4.2015 respectively whereby, the petitioner was informed that the , 1895 was repe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.