SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 49907

THANUSH C M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
['E M MURUGAN', '', 'P RAKESH VAIKOM', 'P R PRATEESH', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']

ORDER

This is an application for regular bail.

2. Petitioner is the accused in the Crime No.391 of 2022 of Palarivattom Police Station registered alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The crux of the allegation raised in the case against the petitioner is that on 15.04.2022 at about 12.30 p.m. at Palarivattom YMJ Stadium Link Road the petitioner/accused had snatched 1.5 sovereign of gold chain worth Rs.60,000/- worn by the defacto complainant and thereby the petitioner committed the offence punishable under Section 392 IPC. Petitioner herein was arrested in connection with the crime on

19.04.2022 and is remaining in custody since then.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor upon instruction submitted that the charge is already laid and that he has no previous antecedents

6. It is seen that the petitioner is in custody from 19.04.2022 onwards. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the nature of the allegations and considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody from 19.04.2022 onwards, I am inclined to grant bail to the peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top