SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 49225

BINDU JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioner states that she is the senior-most HSA (Malayalam) who is entitled to get by transfer appointment as HSST against the retirement vacancy with effect from 15.07.2021. She was consequently appointed by the 4th respondent as HSST in Malayalam. However, the proposal for approval of the appointment was rejected by the 3rd respondent. The said order was upheld later by the higher authorities. The petitioner states that she has now preferred Ext.P7 review petition seeking to review Ext.P6 order of the Government which is stated to be pending.

2. When this matter was taken up for consideration, Sri. V.A.

Muhammed, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the limited request of the petitioner is for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P7 in the light of Exts.P10 to P12 after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner.

3. I have heard Smt. Nisha Bose, the learned Senior Government Pleader. In view of the nature of the order that I propose to pass, notice to respondents 4 and 5 is dispensed with.

4. After having carefully evaluated the contentions raised in this writ petition, the submissions made ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top