Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ALEXANDER THOMAS, Shoba Annamma Eapen, JJ
SAIL STOCKYARD WORKERS UNION (CITU) – Appellant
Versus
M/S.HADIYYA LOGISTICS PRIAVATE LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment arises from appeals against a common writ decision. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner seeks protection against headload workers obstructing mechanized operations. (Para 5 , 10) |
| 3. court highlights mechanized work requiring skilled labor as opposed to manual headload work. (Para 6 , 8) |
JUDGMENT
Alexander Thomas, J.
As both these appeals arise out of the same impugned judgment, rendered in the instant Writ Petition (Civil), W.P(C) No.20667/2020, these cases are disposed of on the basis of this common judgment. 2. The appellants in W.A No.899/2022 are respondents 1 & 2 in the W.P(C) and R1 in the W.A is the writ petitioner and official respondents 2 to 6 in the W.A are official respondents 3 to 7 in the W.P(C), whereas W.A No.1654/2021 has been filed by a third party to the writ proceedings, who has filed the said appeal after securing third party leave. The said third party appellant in W.A No.1654/2021 claims to be a Workers' Union, affiliated to the Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU), which is the cause of the headload workers concerned, like the appellants in W.A No.899/2022.
3. Heard Sri.Philip T.Varghese, learned counsel appearing for the appellants in W.A N
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
