SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 55641

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M.R.ANITHA, J
BHAGEERATHI – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRIKA – Respondent


Advocates:
K.NARAYANAN (PARUR), SMT.LISHA K.R.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.), SRI.T.N.MANOJ

JUDGMENT

This appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.189/2015 on the file of Additional District Court, Irinjalakuda which arose out of judgment and decree in O.S.No.464/2012 on the file of Additional Subordinate Judge's Court, Irinjalakuda.

2. The wife of original defendant is the appellant. The suit is one for fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction. (Parties would hereinafter be referred as per their status before the trial court).

3. An extent of 1.23 acres of land comprised in survey No.188/7 of Koolimuttam Village was purchased by Andy, the husband of 4th plaintiff and father of plaintiffs 1 to 3. Out of which, 50 cents on the eastern side was sold to the defendant and the balance 73 cents is the plaint 'A' schedule property, which is in absolute possession and enjoyment of the plaintiffs. Out of 50 cents sold to the defendant, he sold 5.875 cents of land in the year 2002 to one Subin and Sujith and the balance 44.125 cents is scheduled as plaint 'B' schedule property. There was a clear boundary separating the plaint 'A' and 'B' schedule properties. Plaintiffs 1 and 3 are residing far away from plaint A schedule property. Of late, de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top