SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 63525

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
DINESAN – Appellant
Versus
SUSEELA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The Regular Second Appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.26/2009 on the file of Subordinate Judge's Court, Kochi, which arose out of the judgment and decree in O.S.No.405/2004 on the file of Additional Munsiff's Court, Kochi.

2. The appellant is the defeated plaintiff in both courts.

The suit is one for recovery of possession, permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction. Plaint 'A' schedule property was obtained by the plaintiff as per document No.2503/1983 of Kochi Sub Registry Office. The property is having an extent of 4 cents compromised in survey No.1197/1 of Palluruthy village. Defendant, whose property is situated on the western side of the plaint schedule property, trespassed into a portion of plaint 'A' schedule property in December, 2003 and forcefully constructed a compound wall using concrete slabs and pillars. Though property was measured at the instance of Tahsildar, Kochi, defendant was not agreeable to accept the measurement. Hence the plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of possession of plaint 'B' schedule property having an extent of 445 sq.links and for a mandatory injunction to demolish the compound wall

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top