HIGH COURT OF KERALA
RAHUL MANOJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
This is an application for anticipatory bail.
2. Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.2447 of 2021 of Thiruvalla Police Station, Pathanamthitta District, alleging commission of offences under Sections 452, 354, 354B, 509 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner trespassed into the house of the de-facto complainant and attacked the de-facto complainant, her husband and son and also attempted to outrage the modesty of the de-facto complainant.
3. When this matter is taken up for consideration, it is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to Annexures and 1 and 2 notarized affidavits that the entire issues between the petitioner and the de-facto complainant have been settled. It is submitted that the affidavits have been executed by the de-facto complainant and her husband.
4. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also.
5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and and considering the fact that the entire issues between the petitioner and the de-facto complainant have been settled as evident from Annexure 1 and 2, I am of the opinion that the petitioner can be granted anticip
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.