SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 61854

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Murali Purushothaman, J
LIXY JOHN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioner is working as HSST Home Science in Sacred Heart H.S.S. Payyavoor, Kannur from 04.06.2012. Prior to joining the said service she was employed as a vocational instructor in clothing and embroidery from 2008 to 2012. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is governed by statutory pension scheme instead of contributory pension scheme from National Pension Scheme. The petitioner also contends that by virtue of Ext.P7 Government Order, the petitioner is entitled to receive the refund of the amount that has been paid by her towards the National Pension Scheme. However, the request of the petitioner was rejected by Ext.P5 order of the 3rd respondent. Challenging Ext.P5, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P6 representation before the 1st respondent. The limited prayer of the petitioner is to consider Ext.P6 representation by the 1st respondent.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned the Government Pleader for the respondents.

3. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the contentions raised by the petitioner in the writ petition as well as in Ext.P6 representation, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top