SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 61843

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
AMIT RAWAL, J
DR.RAVEENDRAN. R, – Appellant
Versus
DR. VENU, – Respondent


JUDGMENT

[Con.Case(C) Nos.1330/2021, 1334/2021, 1342/2021, 1349/2021, 1359/2021, 1360/2021, 1364/2021, 1365/2021, 1369/2021, 1376/2021, 1387/2021, 1415/2021, 1426/2021, 1428/2021, 1430/2021, 1499/2021, 1544/2021, 1670/2021]

This Court on the last date of hearing passed the following order:

Purported compliance of the direction of this Court contained in paragraphs 5 and 6 of the judgment dated 9.2.2021 is sought to be made by order dated 29th November, 2021 of the Department of Higher Education. Clause 4 of the aforementioned order reads thus:

“4. For determining the arrears on account of this stepping up of the pay of the senior teacher to that of his junior, the arrears accrued should not exceed the amount found to be actually due under the claim for a period of two years immediately preceding the date on which the anomaly was brought to the notice of the Head of the Department.”

2. Paragraphs 5 and 6 of the judgment of this Court dated

9.2.2021 read thus:

“5. This order has been issued in due compliance of the judgment dated 5.12.2019 rendered in WP. (C)No.33127/2019. Such adoption of pick and chose policy of the respondents is not only atrocious, malicious,but acrimonious.

6. This Cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top