SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 57050

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M.R.ANITHA, J
PRASANNAN, (DIED) (LHR RECORDED) – Appellant
Versus
SIVADASAN – Respondent


Advocates:
ARUN BABU, C.HARIKUMAR, P.BENJAMIN PAUL, MANOJ RAJAGOPAL, MANU RAMACHANDRAN, P.M.JOHNY

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31st day of August, 2022

This Regular Second Appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.29/2012 on the file of Subordinate Judge's Court, Karunagappally which arose out of judgment and decree in O.S.No.39/2009 on the file of Munsiff's Court, Sasthamcotta.

2. The suit is one for permanent prohibitory injunction.

Plaintiffs are the appellants. (Parties would hereinafter be referred as per their status before the trial court).

3. Plaintiffs have got right of easement for ingress and egress through the plaint schedule pathway which is running through the property of defendants as per compromise decree in O.S.No.107/2000 of the Munsiff's Court, Sasthamcotta. During the pendency of the proceedings, plaintiffs in O.S. No.107/2000 transferred the property to the defendants in the suit and hence defendants are bound by the decree in O.S.No.107/2000. Plaintiffs intend to draw pipeline through the pathway provided in the compromise decree in O.S.No.107/2000 since he has no other source of water for satisfying his basic needs. But defendants obstructed him from drawing pipeline through the pathway. Hence the plaintiffs filed the suit for restraining t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top