SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 63245

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SURESH.B @ VAVA SURESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl./9874/2022



Advocates:
M.R.SARIN, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR NAGARAJ NARAYANAN

The court established that anticipatory bail can be granted when custodial interrogation is deemed unnecessary based on the specifics of the case.

Headnote:

Bail - Anticipatory Bail - Wild Life Protection Act Section List - The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under the Wild Life Protection Act after assessing the nature of allegations and the necessity for custodial interrogation, imposing stringent conditions for bail.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner faced accusations of exhibiting a poisonous cobra during a public speech, leading to charges under the Wild Life Protection Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court determined that custodial interrogation was not essential for the investigation based on the circumstances and allegations, thus granting bail with specified conditions.

Issues: Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner facing charges under the Wild Life Protection Act and whether custodial interrogation is necessary.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the nature of the alleged offense did not warrant custodial interrogation, emphasizing the need to balance the rights of the accused with the interests of justice.

Final Decision: Anticipatory bail granted subject to stringent conditions.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 BAIL APPL. NO. 9874 OF 2022 O. R. No. 12/2022 of Thamarassery Forest Range Office, Kozhikode PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

SURESH.B @ VAVA SURESH AGED 49 YEARS TC 8/207, THERUVILA VEEDU, CHERUVIKKAL, SREEKARIYAM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695017 BY ADV M.R.SARIN RESPONDENT/STATE:

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031

2 THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER FOREST RANGE OFFICE, THAMARASSERY, KHOZHIKODE, PIN - 695303 BY ADVS.

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR NAGARAJ NARAYANAN OTHER PRESENT:

PP – SRI. M.C.ASHI THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

16.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

VIJU ABRAHAM, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 16th day of December, 2022

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in O. R. No. 12/2022 of Thamarassery Forest Range Office, Kozhikode, alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 2 , 9, 40 and 51 of the Wild Life Protection Act .

3. The prosecution allegation is that, on 28.11.2022, the accused had displayed a highly poisonous cobra next to the mike while delivering his speech, while attending an event organized at Government Medical College Kozhikode.

4. I have heard the learned Public Prosecutor also.

5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations, I am of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be required for the purpose of investigation and only a limited custody be granted for the said purpose. Therefore, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to stringent conditions. In the result, this application is allowed. It is directed that the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer on 06.01.2023, at 11 a.m, and subject himself for interrogation on that day and on any other day/days as directed by the investigating officer. The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation. In the event of arrest in O. R. No. 12/2022 of Thamarassery Forest Range Office, Kozhikode, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional Court on the very same day and shall be released on bail, subject to the following conditions:-

(I) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court ;

(ii) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer in O. R. No. 12/2022 of Thamarassery Forest Range Office, Kozhikode as and when summoned to do so;

(iii) The petitioner shall not attempt to contact the defacto complainant or interfere with the investigation or to influence or intimidate any witness in O. R. No. 12/2022 of Thamarassery Forest Range Office, Kozhikode;

(iv) The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.

If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the investigating officer in O. R. No. 12/2022 of Thamarassery Forest Range Office, Kozhikode may file an application before the jurisdictional Court, for cancellation of bail.

It is made clear that it is within the power of the police to investigate the matter and if necessary to effect recoveries on the information if any given by the petitioner, even when the petitioner is on bail as per the judgment of the Apex Court inSushila Aggarwal and others v. State(NCT of Delhi) and another( 2020(1)KHC 663 ).

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sm/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top