Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JJ
HINDU SEVA KENDRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash auction notice. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court admisssion and notices issued. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondent's counter affidavit filed. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. counter affidavits from respondents. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. additional affidavit from guruvayur devaswom admin. (Para 10) |
| 6. arguments from petitioner's counsel and respondents. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 7. legal definitions and committee duties established. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 8. committee functions as a trustee. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 9. section 11 details for property alienation. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 10. procedures and authority for property possession. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 11. trustee responsibilities in property management. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 12. trustee's duty emphasized under law. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 13. commissioner's duties outlined in decision-making. (Para 30) |
| 14. court directs commissioner to decide auction issues. (Para 31) |
JUDGMENT “CR”
Anil K. Narendran, J
The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 tender notification dated 10.12.2021 issued by the Administrator of the 2nd respondent- Guruvayur Devaswom M
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
