SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 61918

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JJ
HINDU SEVA KENDRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
W.P.(C)NO.284 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R.KRISHNA RAJ, K.R.PRATHISH, E.S.SONI, KUMARI SANGEETHA S.NAIR, RESMI.K.R, RAJEESH.V.R
For the Respondents: T.K.VIPINDAS, SAJI SANKARAN NAIR, SRI S RAJMOHAN- SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee must adhere to statutory procedures for auctioning properties as per Section 11 of the Guruvayur Devaswom Act, ensuring public interest and allowing for objections before finalizing sales.

Headnote:(A) Guruvayur Devaswom Act, 1978 - Section 11 - Writ Petition under Article 226 - Challenge to auction conducted for a Mahindra Thar Jeep by Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee - Petitioner argues auction illegal due to not following procedures under the Act - Court clarified that proper procedures under Section 11 must be observed, including invitation for objections before sanctioning sale. (Paras 1-31)

(B) Legal Duty of Trustees - Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee acts as a trustee and must uphold public interest in managing temple properties - Their actions are subjected to the provisions of the Guruvayur Devaswom Act. (Paras 13-18)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner challenges the validity of the auction of the Mahindra Thar Jeep intended as an offering to a deity, contending violation of statutory procedures for sale under the Guruvayur Devaswom Act.

Issues: Main issues addressed include the legality of the auction process and adherence to the provisions of the Guruvayur Devaswom Act for asset disposal.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the auction conducted did not abide by the necessary conditions set out in the Guruvayur Devaswom Act, especially regarding sale sanction procedures.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity for the Commissioner to follow statutory procedures before any sanction of the sale could be granted, ensuring compliance with public interest and necessary scrutiny of auction processes.

Result: The writ petition was disposed of directing the Commissioner to appropriately consider the auction and its legality under the Act.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks to quash auction notice. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court admisssion and notices issued. (Para 3 , 4)
3. respondent's counter affidavit filed. (Para 5 , 6)
4. counter affidavits from respondents. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. additional affidavit from guruvayur devaswom admin. (Para 10)
6. arguments from petitioner's counsel and respondents. (Para 11 , 12)
7. legal definitions and committee duties established. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
8. committee functions as a trustee. (Para 17 , 18)
9. section 11 details for property alienation. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
10. procedures and authority for property possession. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
11. trustee responsibilities in property management. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
12. trustee's duty emphasized under law. (Para 28 , 29)
13. commissioner's duties outlined in decision-making. (Para 30)
14. court directs commissioner to decide auction issues. (Para 31)

JUDGMENT “CR”

Anil K. Narendran, J

The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 tender notification dated 10.12.2021 issued by the Administrator of the 2nd respondent- Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee regarding the auction of a Mahindra Thar Jeep bearing registration No.KL- 46/V-9454, an offering by the 4th respondent, to Lord Guruvayurappan, the minor deity of Guruvayur Temple. The petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 3 not to auction Mahindra Thar Jeep bearing registration No.KL-46/V-9454.

2. Going by the averments in the writ petition the 4th respondent herein, who is the Chairman of Mahindra Group, offered a Mahindra Thar Jeep to Lord Guruvayurappan on 08.12.2021. The Administrator of Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee published Ext.P1 auction notice on the official website of Guruvayur Devaswom, on 10.12.2021, regarding the sale of that vehicle. As per Ext.P1 auction notice dated 10.12.2021, the bidders are required to remit Rs.40,000/- as earnest money deposit (EMD). The successful bidder has to remit 50% of the bid amount, on the date of the auction itself, and the balance amount within a period of three days from the date of confirmation. He has also to pay Goods and Services Tax (GST) at the rate of 18% for the bid amount. The auction will be confirmed in the name of the successful bidder only after the approval is granted by Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee. Thereafter, the documents relating to the vehicle will be handed over to the successful bidder. On effecting transfer of ownership, the successful bidder will be permitted to take possession of the vehicle. As per Ext.P1 auction notice, the Administrator of Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee shall have absolute discretion either to accept the bid, adjourn the auction or cancel the auction. In the auction conducted on 18.12.2021, a representative of the 5th respondent alone participated, who quoted an amount of Rs.15,10,000/-, as against the upset price of Rs.15,00,000/-. According to the petitioner, the auction conducted on 18.12.2021 is absolutely illegal. The auction was conducted on the ground that the Devaswom cannot use an off-road vehicle for daily use, which is absolutely incorrect. Moreover, the procedure adopted by the 2nd respondent for conducting the auction was in clear violation of the provisions under Section 11 of the Guruvayur Devaswom Act , 1978, and also Rule 12 of the Guruvayur Devaswom Rules, 1980. Along with the writ petition the petitioner has produced Exts.P2 and P3 news reports that appeared on 21.12.2021, Ext.P4 registration particulars of the vehicle in question, and also Ext.P5 information collected from Wikipedia on off-road vehicles. The document marked as Ext.P6 is a copy of an application made by one Sreenath Padmanabhan, under the provisions of the Right to Information Act , 2005, before the Public Information Officer in Guruvayur Devaswom for obtaining copy of the documents relatin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top