JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the fact that his Securitisation Application (Ext. P6) has not been numbered by the registry on the ground that it is bared by limitation.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner has filed a chamber appeal as provided for in Rule 5, sub-clause (5) of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rule 1993 and the same is yet to be taken up for consideration. It is submitted that in the meanwhile an Advocate Commissioner has been appointed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Alappuzha and the notice has been issued to the petitioner proposing to take possession of the secured asset today.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that till a decision is taken on Ext. P7, the proceedings for taking physical possession may be kept in abeyance. It is also pointed out that since the Advocate Commissioner has issued notice for taking physical possession, a fresh cause of action has arisen and even if the Securitisation Application already filed is bared by limitation, the petitioner will be within time to challenge the proceedings under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank states that the notice for taking physical possession issued by the Advocate Commissioner does not amount to a fresh cause of action. However, he has no objection to direction being issued to the Tribunal to consider and pass orders on Ext. P7. It is submitted that if the petitioner has a case that the notice issued by the Advocate Commissioner amounts to a fresh cause of action, he has also to amend the Securitisation Application.
5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case this writ petition is disposed of directing the Debt Recovery Tribunal-II, Ernakulam to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7 application and also to consider whether the Securitisation Application will be in time with reference to the proceedings initiated under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, provided the petitioner amends the Securitisation Application already filed. The proceedings for taking physical possession of secured asset shall stand suspended for a period of three weeks from today to enable the petitioner to seek appropriate reliefs from the Tribunal.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.