Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS, J
N.CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, P.J. JOSE, ADDL. DEEPU CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appeals arising from misappropriation charges. (Para 1) |
| 2. summary of allegations against accused and their roles. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. prosecution evidence establishing facts of misappropriation. (Para 6 , 7 , 23) |
| 4. witnesses and documentation affirming accusations. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 5. court's reflections on verdict and modification of sentences. (Para 34) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
These appeals arise from various criminal proceedings initiated by the Central Bureau of Investigation in relation to the allegations of misappropriation and falsification of accounts by the employees of the Coffee Board Kerala.
2. Crl.Appeal.Nos.1908 of 2004 and 1942 of 2004 arise from C.C.No.1 of 1995. Crl.Appeal.Nos.2142 and 2143 of 2004 arise from C.C.No.6 of 1994. Crl.Appeal.Nos.583 of 2006 and 580 of 2006 arise from C.C.No.36 of 1998. Crl.Appeal.No.166, 176 and 177 of 2005 arise from C.C.No.7 of 1994. All the criminal cases were pending before the Special Judge (SPE/CBI)-I, Ernakulam for offences punishable under sections 120B r/w 409, 467, 471 and 477A IPC and Section 5(2) R/w 5(1)(c) of PC Act 1947. All the appellants stand convicted by separate judgments in each of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
