HIGH COURT OF KERALA
RAMESHKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
All these writ petitions are connected and therefore, I am disposing of these writ petitions by a common judgment.
2. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.8381 of 2022 is the owner of 4.05 Ares (10 cents) of residential plot in Re-survey No.50/3 in Puthussery East Village in Palakkadu Taluk in Palakkadu District. The petitioner got the property from his son Syamlal as per the settlement deed No.5203/2015. Petitioner's son Syamlal purchased the property in the year 2011 vide Sale Deed No.2117/2011. According to the petitioner, the property is not a paddy land and the same was converted to coconut plantations even before the commencement of Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008. The son of the petitioner made an application for building permit and the 4th respondent issued a building permit to construct a residential building. The Village Officer, Puthussery East on 07.05.2011 issued a possession certificate to the son of the petitioner showing that the property is a residential plot. After construction of the house, the building was assessed for one time tax. After completion of residential building, the petitioner submitted a completion report and requested to num
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.