SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 22752

RAMLA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
['U P BALAKRISHNAN', '', 'K R AVINASH KUNNATH', 'C H ABDUL RASAC', 'U V PRADEEPAN']

ORDER

The petitioner is the de facto complainant in S.T. No.87/2019 on the file of the Grama Nyayalaya, Kunnummal Block, Kuttiadi, Kozhikode. The aforesaid complaint was submitted by her against the 2nd respondent herein for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 31 of Domestic Violence Act. In addition to the above, Annexure 2 private complaint was also filed against the 2nd respondent by the petitioner herein for the offences punishable under Section 323, 324, 341 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 31 of Domestic Violence Act as well. The petitioner later submitted an application seeking joint trial of both the above proceedings which was dismissed as per Annexure 4. This Crl.M.C. is filed challenging Annexure 4.

2. Heard Sri.U.P. Balakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.Ranjit George, learned Public Prosecutor for the State.

3. Subsequent to the filing of the Crl.M.C. it is known that the Grama Nyayalaya has passed Annexure 5 order wherein prayer sought for by the petitioner for joint trial is ordered. On going through Annexure 4 order it can be seen that the reason cited by the Grama Nyayalaya is th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top