SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 17773

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Ziyad Rahman A. A, J
SAJU MOOLAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


O R D E R

The petitioner is the 3rd accused in Crime No.1001 of 2018 of Angamaly Police Station. The aforesaid crime is registered against the petitioner and two others, who are his brothers, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471 read with Section 34 IPC. The 2nd respondent is the de facto complaint therein who is another brother of the petitioner herein. Annexure-1 is the First Information Report. This Crl.M.C. is filed seeking to quash the aforesaid FIR and all further proceedings pursuant there to, on the ground that the allegations raised against the petitioners are purely civil in nature and no criminal offences as alleged therein are attracted.

2. Heard Sri.G.S.Raghunath, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.C.Unnikrishnan learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and Sri.Sudheer Gopalakrishnan, learned Public Prosecutor for the State.

3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted elaborately the sequence of events which ultimately led to the registration of Annexure-1 complaint with specific reference to Annexure-3 to Annexure-19. The factual sequence which are necessary for the consideration of this Crl.M.C. as contended by the learned counsel for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top