SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 7834

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.S. DIAS, J
K.P.LATHIKA – Appellant
Versus
VINOD – Respondent


Advocates:
ADV SRI.LAL GEORGE, ADV SRI.D.ANIL KUMAR

COMMON JUDGMENT

Dated this the 22nd day of March, 2022 As the appeal and cross objection arise out of the same award, they have been disposed of by this common judgment. The appellants were the petitioners in O.P (MV) No.786/2009 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ernakulam. The respondents in the appeal were the respondents before the Tribunal.

2. The appellants had filed the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act , 1988, claiming compensation on account of the death of Santhosh Kumar (deceased) – the husband of the first appellant and the father of the appellants 2 to 4. It was their case that, on 22.06.2008, while the deceased was travelling with the appellants 1 and 2 from Aluva to Palakkad in their car bearing registration No. KL 9/H 4982, a bus bearing registration No. KL -8/W 5650, driven by the first respondent in a negligent manner came from the opposite direction and hit the car of the deceased. Even though the deceased was rushed to the Paalana Institute of Medical Sciences, Kannadi, he lost his life. The deceased was employed as Deputy Controller, Legal Metrology Department, Government of Kerala and was drawing a monthly salary of Rs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top