SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 5287

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SARASWATHY AMMA – Appellant
Versus
LISSY JOSE – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This R.S.A. has been directed against the judgment and decree in A.S. No.40/2012 on the file of Additional Sub Court, Irinjalakuda, which in turn arise out of the judgment and decree in O.S. No.692/2007 on the file of Additional Munsiff’s Court, Irinjalakuda.

2. The suit is one for specific performance of agreement for sale. The defendant is the appellant (parties would hereafter be referred as per the status before the trial court). The plaintiff and the defendant entered into an agreement for sale with respect to the plaint schedule property having an extent of 5¾ cents in Muriyad Village of Mukundapuram Taluk on 02.09.2005 on a consideration of Rs.1 lakhs. Out of which Rs.58,000/- was paid towards advance. The defendant agreed to receive the balance consideration on or before 02.8.2006 and execute the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff issued registered notice demanding the execution of sale deed on 02.08.2006 and he was present before the Sub Registrar Office on the whole day but the defendant did not turn up, hence the suit has been filed.

3. Defendant remained ex-parte. Plaintiff filed proof affidavit and Ext.A1 to A3 were marked.

4. The learned Munsiff,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top