SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4218

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Devan Ramachandran, J
K M BASHEER – Appellant
Versus
THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LR) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court asserting that a suo motu proceedings, bearing S.M.No.1924 of 2021, has been initiated against him by the 1st respondent - Special Tahsildar (LR); and seeks that the same be directed to be disposed of within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. In response, the learned Senior Government Pleader, Smt.K.Amminikutty, submitted that the afore mentioned suo motu proceedings was initiated against the petitioner only in December, 2021 and therefore, that this writ petition is premature.

3. When I hear the learned Senior Government Pleader as afore, it is without doubt that this Court has been ordering suo motu proceedings to be disposed of within a time frame. That said, though this Court normally fixes eighteen months time for the Competent Authority to complete proceedings, I am of the view that in this case it will be justified to expand it to twenty four months, since the application of the petitioner has been made only very recently.

Resultantly, this writ petition is ordered, directing the 1st respondent - Special Tahsildar (LR) to complete proceedings in S.M.No.1924 of 2021, after following due procedure and after affording necess

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top