SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 152

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
Shabana – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 15079 OF 2021 | WP(C) NO. 19 OF 2022 | WP(C) NO. 37 OF 2022 | WP(C) NO. 36 OF 2022 | WP(C) NO. 35 OF 2022 | WP(C) NO. 95 OF 2022 | WP(C) NO. 105 OF 2022 | WP(C) NO. 110 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Arun Mathew Vadakkan, Abdul Rashiq A.
For the Respondents: Smt. Vidya Kuriakose, GP

A Chairman of the District Disaster Management Authority cannot unilaterally impose regulations without emergency justification or proper statutory authority, as established under the Disaster Management Act, 2005.

Headnote:(A) Disaster Management Act, 2005 - Sections 26(2), 30, 33 and 34 - District Disaster Management Authority - Permission for soil removal - Impugned order issued by Chairman, District Disaster Management Authority concerning filling wetlands without proper permission stated to be illegal as it was not exercised in an emergent situation - The order lacks powers of the District Authority and is quashed. (Paras 1-20)

(B) Powers of the District Authority - The order is not merely administrative but attempts to generalize control over natural resources in a manner not aligned with specific disaster management protocols. (Paras 10-15)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged a detailed order regarding environmental protection and misuse of natural resources in Kollam district. The Chairman issued the order expressing concerns over filling wetlands leading to potential ecological disasters.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the Chairman exceeded jurisdiction, reinforcing need for adherence to statutory protocols requiring consultation with local authorities for disaster management plans.

Issues: Whether the Chairman possesses the authority to unilaterally impose conditions regarding soil removal to prevent disaster without consultation and in non-emergent conditions?

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that indeed powers under the Act are conferred to facilitate proactive measures in genuine emergencies and cannot be wielded to impose restrictive conditions arbitrarily.

Result: Writ petitions allowed; impugned order quashed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to orders regarding disaster management and environmental protection. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. counsels for petitioners' arguments against jurisdiction and legal validity. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. consideration of authority and compliance with statutory regulations. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. judicial ruling against unilateral orders without emergency context. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 19)

JUDGMENT

All these batch of cases are filed challenging order No. DCKLM/1827/2020-DM2(5) dated 02.07.2021 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned order) passed by the Chairman, District Disaster Management Authority, Kollam. Since all these cases are filed challenging the very same order, I am disposing of this batch of writ petitions by a common judgment.

2. The impugned order passed by the Chairman is a detailed order that deals with the environmental aspects and the need to protect the same for the well being of the people. It is stated in the impugned order that the land in Kollam district is rich in natural freshwater reservoirs that includes fields, creeks, and other wetlands. It is stated that, during the Monsoon season, these reservoirs contain floodwaters which in summer helps keep the water table of the nearby wells, ponds, and other freshwater sources low. It is further stated that all that has become a myth throughout the Kollam District. It is further stated that much of the area in the district was waterlogged, and today the area is shrinking and is on the verge of oblivion. The apprehension raised by the Chairman in the impugned order is that there is a rush to fill up the last few wetlands and use them for commercial purposes. This has been brought to the notice of the Chairman by the general public through social media. According to the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority, the above acts will endanger the very existence of man. It is also stated that it is impossible to restore the wetlands that have been subjected to such malpractices. It is further stated that, in a densely populated district like Kollam, permission is given to remove soil with restrictions for a number of reasons. The most important of these reasons is granting permission to remove soil to avoid the threat of disaster as part of the Disaster Management activities. It is conceded by the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority that such permission is strictly legal and is granted only on the basis of site inspection and favourable recommendations of the Tahsildar concerned and Geologist. It is only to avoid the threat of disaster. It is also stated that the Disaster Management permissions are issued with strict conditions to monitor where the soil is deposited and to ensure that it is not dumped into the ground or other wetlands for any reason. The permit also stipulates that the earth soil is to be deposited in such places only with the prior permission of the Jurisdictional Tahsildar.

3. It is submitted that the permission for the removal of soil for various development purposes is being granted by the Department of Geology. The permission issued by the Department of Geology does not contain any provision as to where the soil so removed is to be placed. It is submitted by the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority that, complaints have also been received that the soil removed in this way is being used to fill wetlands and paddy fields. According to the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority, conditions similar to those set out in the permit issued under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (In short, the Act 2005) is necessary to prevent this utterly undesirable acts. Hence a condition is imposed in the impugned order passed by the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority to deposit the removed earth on dry lands only, as the practice of paddy and wetland filling is on the rise which has already led to various environmental disaster. According to the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority, unless this prior permission of depositing the rem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top