SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 771

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
DR.SHABNAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
['T ASAFALI', '', 'LALIZA T Y', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']

O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the 3rd accused in Crime No.10/2022 alleging the commission of offences under Section 324, 354, 406 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner and the other accused is that after the solemnization of the marriage of the brother of the petitioner with the defacto complainant, the petitioner along with her mother had gone to the bridal room of the defacto complainant and required her to give her entire gold ornaments. It is also alleged that the defacto complainant was subjected to continous harassment both mental and physical with the demand for dowry and other valuables.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the allegations are total baseless and fabricated. It is submitted that the petitioner is a doctor by profession and thie sister of the husband of the defacto complainant. It is submitted that the petitioner had no occasion to harass the defacto complainant in any manner. It is submitted that all the allegations against the petitioner are put up and made only to harass her. It is submitted that at any rate custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top