HIGH COURT OF KERALA
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
RAJESH CHANDRASEKHARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl./2359/2022
Bail - Anticipatory Bail - IPC Section 420, 120B; BUDS Act Sections 8, 19, 34 - This case discusses the conditions under which anticipatory bail can be granted when an accused is alleged to have committed financial offences, clarifying the jurisdiction of courts and applicability of BUDS Act provisions.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, accused of cheating and conspiracy in accepting deposits unlawfully, argue they are falsely implicated. The complaint arises from a failed deposit, which matured, but the complainant did not collect the amount.
Finding of the Court:
The court recognized that custodial interrogation was unnecessary for investigation; thus, granting limited custody and setting conditions for bail while affirming the legitimacy of the petitioners' operations.
Issues: Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. with respect to offences under the BUDS Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court distinguished the BUDS Act from the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act by finding no prohibition against anticipatory bail applications in the former, upholding the High Court's jurisdiction.
Final Decision: Anticipatory bail granted with conditions set for the petitioners.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 BAIL APPL. NO. 2359 OF 2022 CRIME NO.152/2022 OF ELAMAKKARA POLICE STATION, Ernakulam PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 4:
1 RAJESH CHANDRASEKHARAN, S/O.CHANDRASEKHARAN PILLAI AGED 44 YEARS,CHANDRAKANDAM HOUSE, KOCHAMBAM, MANNAM P.O, NORTH PARAVOOR, PIN - 683520
2 AKHIN FRANCIS,S/O. FRANCIS M.D, AGED 35 YEARS, MAROTTIKKAL HOUSE, P.O.
THIYARAM, THRISSSUR, PIN - 680026
3 ANOOP THOMAS,S/O. M.P. THOMAS, AGED 34 YEARS NELLIKKUNNATHU HOUSE, PANDAMKARY P.O, EDATHUA, ALAPPUZHA 689 573, PIN - 689573
4 SHERIN BIBIN,D/O.GOPI, AGED 39 YEARS PUTHENVEEDU HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR, CARMEL, THATTAZHAM P.O, NEAR DONBOSCO JUNIOR L.P. SCHOOL, VADUTHALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682023 BY ADVS.
THOMAS T.VARGHESE PHILIP T.VARGHESE ACHU SUBHA ABRAHAM V.T.LITHA B.RAMAN PILLAI (SR.)(R-260)
RESPONDENT/STATE AND INVESTIGATING OFFICER:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ELAMAKKARA POLICE STATION, ELAMAKKARA, PIN - 682036 ADDL.R3 JAFFER KHAN, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.OUKKAR HAJI, KARUVALLY HOUSE, VENGOLA P.O., PERUMANI, PERUMBAVOOR, PIN 683 556 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 29.11.2022 IN CRL.M.A.NO.1 OF 2022)
R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.NIMA JACOB R3 BY ADVS.K.A.SIYAD M.REVIKRISHNAN(K/1268/2004)
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
................................................................. .................................................................
Dated this the 29th day of November, 2022
ORDER
This is an application for anticipatory bail.
2. Petitioners are arrayed as accused in Crime No.152 of
2022 of Elamakkara Police Station registered alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 420 and 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .
3. The gist of allegation is that the accused persons committed criminal conspiracy and have accepted deposits in violation of Rules in the name of the concern “Mavensworth Credits and Financial Services” and that they have accepted fixed deposit of Rs.20,000/- from the complainant on 02.07.2021 intending to make unlawful gain and thereby cheated him. The complainant got the FIR registered by filing a private complaint before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Aluva.
4. Petitioners submit that they have been falsely implicated in the above side crime. The defacto complainant made a deposit of Rs. 20,000/- on 02.07.2021 with “Mavensworth India Nidhi Ltd.” for a period of 12 months. Petitioners apprehend that the said deposit was made with an intention of raising a complaint as a depositor. Petitioners have produced Annexure 4 document, which is an information received by the defacto complainant from the Registrar of Companies under the Right to Information Act and a perusal of the same would reveal that the information was sought on 28.05.2021, i.e., before the deposit was made by him on 02.07.2021. The intention of the defacto complainant is only to harass and intimidate the petitioners and destroy the reputation and business of the concerns in which they are involved. Petitioners 1 to 3 were associated with one M/s.Vishwadeepti Multi-State Co- operative Society and the petitioners left the concern due to a difference of opinion with the management. Thereafter, they started the Nidhi Company by the name, “Mavensworth India Nidhi Ltd.” and the certificate of incorporation is produced as Annexure 5. Petitioners 1 to 3 are also partners in Mavensworth Credit and Financial Services, and they have obtained licence under the Kerala Money Lenders Act as is evident from Annexures A6, A7 and A8. Petitioners 1 to 3 are also associated with Southern Green Farming and Marketing Multi-State Co- operative Society Ltd. and Annexure 9 is the certificate of registration. The partnership firm, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.