HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ALEXANDER THOMAS, Shoba Annamma Eapen, JJ
SAIL STOCKYARD WORKERS UNION (CITU) – Appellant
Versus
M/S.HADIYYA LOGISTICS PRIAVATE LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial respect for statutory frameworks affects judicial review. (Para 1 , 20) |
| 2. claims of headload workers must be evaluated against mechanized operations and relevant labor laws. (Para 2 , 6 , 12) |
JUDGMENT
Alexander Thomas, J.
As both these appeals arise out of the same impugned judgment, rendered in the instant Writ Petition (Civil), W.P(C) No.20667/2020, these cases are disposed of on the basis of this common judgment. 2. The appellants in W.A No.899/2022 are respondents 1 & 2 in the W.P(C) and R1 in the W.A is the writ petitioner and official respondents 2 to 6 in the W.A are official respondents 3 to 7 in the W.P(C), whereas W.A No.1654/2021 has been filed by a third party to the writ proceedings, who has filed the said appeal after securing third party leave. The said third party appellant in W.A No.1654/2021 claims to be a Workers' Union, affiliated to the Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU), which is the cause of the headload workers concerned, like the appellants in W.A No.899/2022.
3. Heard Sri.Philip T.Varghese, learned counsel appearing for the appellants in W.A No.899/2022, Sri.Legith T.Kottakkal, learned counsel appearing for the appellant in W.A No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.