SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 7383

DON BABY – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


Advocates:
['R BINDU SASTHAMANGALAM', '', 'G RAJAGOPAL KUMMANAM', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2022.

This appeal is directed against an order passed by Court of Sessions, Ernakulam in Crl.MC. No.856/2022. Crl.M.C. 856/2022 is an application filed by the appellants as accused No.1 and 2 in Crime No.217/2022 of Kutampuzha Police Station under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C’) seeking pre- arrest bail. Said application was dismissed by the court below for the reason that Section 18A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 ( for short SC/ST (POA) Act) provides for a bar against exercise of jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C in a crime stands registered for offences coming within the purview of the Act.

2. This Court has directed the learned Public Prosecutor to furnish a copy of the FIS. The learned Public Prosecutor has read the FIS in full. It is doubtful, whether the allegations raised would attract offences under the SC/ST (POA) Act. In the above circumstances, the court below is erred in holding that the bar under Section 18A(2) of the SC/ST (POA) Act will operate in the case.

3. In the result, the Crl.Appeal stands allowed. The order passed in Crl.M.C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top