SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 1809

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.S. DIAS, J
SUJATHA NARAYAN K.A.
– Appellant
Versus

SUPRABATH K., – Respondent
Tr.P(C) 469 2022



Advocates:
P.K.MOHANAN, R.SREEHARI, HAMZA A.V.

The court highlighted the importance of consolidating related family law matters for judicial efficiency under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Headnote:

Transfer - Family Law - Code of Civil Procedure - Section 24 - The court exercised its discretion to transfer a case to ensure consolidation of proceedings, saving judicial time and avoiding conflicting decisions.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, seeking a transfer of her case from one Family Court to another, argued for consolidation due to ongoing divorce and custody proceedings between her and the respondent.

Issues: Whether the transfer of the case was justified to ensure a consolidated trial in the interest of judicial efficiency.

Ratio Decidendi: The assessment of convenience in litigation and the promotion of judicial efficacy warranted the transfer of the case under the discretionary powers outlined in the Code.

Final Decision: The transfer petition was allowed, moving the case from the Family Court, Ottapalam to the Family Court, Palakkad.

ORDER

The transfer petition is filed under Sec.24 of the Code of Civil Procedure , seeking to transfer OP No.767/2021 (Annexure 3) from the Family Court, Ottapalam to the Family Court, Palakkad.

2. The petitioner’s case in brief, in the memorandum of transfer petition is that, she is the wife of the respondent. They have two children born in the wedlock. Their marital relation is strained. The respondent has filed O.P.No.394/2021 (Annexure 1) before the Family Court, Palakkad against the petitioner for divorce. As the custody of the children was denied to the petitioner, she filed Annexure A3 before the Family Court, Ottapalam, the competent Court within whose jurisdiction the children are residing. Since there are two proceedings between the parties in two courts, Annexure A3 may be transferred from the Family Court, Ottapalam to the Family Court, Palakkad, so that the cases can be consolidated and jointly tried, which would save precious judicial time and avoid conflict of decisions and would be convenient to both parties. Hence, the transfer petition.

3. Heard; Sri. P.K. Mohanan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. R.Sreehari, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

4. Sri. R. Sreehari submitted that the Family Court, Ottapalam and the Family Court, Palakkad are equidistant for the parties and, therefore, the respondent has no objection in Annexure A3 being transferred from the Family Court, Ottapalam to the Family Court, Palakkad.

5. In the light of the above submission and on a consideration of the pleadings and materials, I am of the view that the transfer petition is to be allowed, so that the cases can be consolidated and jointly tried, which would save precious judicial time.

In the result, in exercise of the discretionary powers of this Court under Article 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure , I allow the transfer petition in the following manner:

(i) OP No.767/2021 is transferred from the Family Court, Ottapalam to the Family Court, Palakkad.

(ii) The parties would be at liberty to move the Family Court, Palakkad and seek for consolidation and joint trial of all the cases between them.

(iii) The Registry shall forward a copy of this order to the Family Court, Ottapalam with instructions to forthwith transmit the records in Annexure-A3 to the Family Court, Palakkad.

(iv) The Family Court, Palakkad shall, immediately on receipt of the records in Annexure-A3, post the case along with Annexure A1.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

rkc/26.09.22

APPENDIX OF TR.P(C) 469/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED

24.03.2021 IN O.P. 394 OF 2021 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD FILED BY THE RESPONDENT AGAINST THE PETITIONER.

Annexure 2 TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER STATEMENT DATED

15.06.2022 IN O.P. 394/2021 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD.

Annexure 3 TRUE COPY OF THE O.P. 767/2021 DATED

08.11.2021 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, OTTAPALAM.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top