Back
2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4781
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. Muhamed Mustaque, Shoba Annamma Eapen, JJ
STATE OF KERALA – Appellant
Versus
P.P. VISWANATHAN NAIR – Respondent
LA.App. 793 2013
SMT.N.SUDHADEVI, GOVERNMENT PLEADER; SRI.S.M.PRASANTH; SRI.T.H.ARAVIND; SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR, SC, KERALA ROAD FUND BOARD
The court established that proper classification and valuation of land are essential in determining just compensation for land acquisition.
Headnote:
Land Acquisition - Kerala Land Acquisition Act - Section 54, 23(1A) - The court found that the fixed compensation by the Reference Court was inadequate and adjusted it based on the true market value and classification of the acquired properties.
Fact of the Case:
The appeals involved compensation for land acquired for road widening under the Kerala Land Acquisition Act, with disputes over valuation by the State and claimants related to adjacent acquired properties based on a 2010 notification.
Finding of the Court:
The court upheld the Reference Court's classification of the acquired land as garden land, deemed the earlier compensation inadequate, and enhanced the compensation to Rs.4,50,000 per cent based on proper valuation.
Issues: Whether the Reference Court correctly classified the acquired lands and if the compensation awarded was just and reasonable.
Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed the classification of all acquired lands as garden land and rejected the State's argument regarding inadequate valuation, supporting a higher compensation based on the land's potential.
Final Decision: Compensation enhanced to Rs.4,50,000 per cent; appeals partly allowed.
J U D G M E N T
Shoba Annamma Eapen J :
These Land Acquisition Appeals are filed under Section 54 of the Kerala Land Acquisition Act ,1961 in respect of lands acquired for the purpose of widening of Kovoor-Vellimadukunnu Road, which is a project under Kozhikode City Road Improvement Project as per Notification :-2-:
dated 08.07.2010. Challenging the enhanced compensation awarded in Land Acquisition Reference cases and dissatisfied with the compensation awarded, the State as well the claimants are in appeal. LAA Nos. 63/2018, 275/2015, 300/2015, 321/2015, 345/2015, 365/2015, 367/2015, 384/2015, 433/2015, 434/2015, 435/2015, 438/2015, 439/2015, 446/2015, 447/2015, 453/2015, 462/2015, 13/2017, 28/2017, 513/2015, 51/2017, 68/2017, 105/2017, 198/2017, 278/2017, 285/2017, 793/2013, 179/2014, 180/2014, 200/2014, 210/2014, 217/2014, 111/2016, 245/2014, 250/2014, 279/2014, 294/2014, 300/2014, 301/2014, 310/2014, 194/2016, 319/2014, 196/2016, 206/2016, 209/2016, 335/2014, 338/2014, 343/2014, 356/2014, 357/2014, 234/2016, 260/2016, 266/2016, 267/2016, 275/2016, 286/2016, 287/2016, 291/2016, 292/2016, 293/2016, 421/2014, 429/2014, 454/2014, 455/2014, 459/2014, 461/2014, 462/2014, 463/2014, 468/2014, 472/2014, 362/2016, 365/2016, 370/2016, 371/2016, 497/2014, 374/2016, 504/2014, 380/2016, 381/2016, 382/2016, 507/2014, 383/2016, 509/2014, 386/2016, 515/2014, 521/2014, 526/2014, 534/2014, 412/2016, 415/2016, 416/2016, 417/2016, 420/2016, 423/2016, 424/2016, 579/2014, :-3-:
586/2014, 591/2014, 600/2014, 602/2014, 613/2014, 703/2014, 713/2014, 721/2014, 722/2014, 724/2014, 729/2014, 739/2014, 747/2014, 792/2014, 794/2014, 796/2014, 797/2014, 799/2014, 800/2014, 809/2014, 810/2014, 812/2014, 813/2014, 814/2014, 815/2014, 816/2014, 817/2014, 819/2014, 820/2014, 821/2014, 822/2014, 823/2014, 824/2014, 828/2014, 831/2014, 832/2014, 833/2014, 835/2014, 842/2014, 843/2014, 844/2014, 846/2014, 847/2014, 848/2014, 849/2014, 850/2014, 851/2014, 856/2014, 857/2014, 859/2014, 871/2014, 893/2014, 898/2014, 913/2014, 261/2016 are filed by the State challenging the enhanced compensation, Cross Objection Nos.121/2014 in LAA No.335/2014, 148/2022 in LAA No.454/2014 and 17/2022 in LAA No.429/2014 are filed by the claimants and LAA Nos..692/2013, 693/2013, 694/2013, 701/203, 702/2013, 344/2016, 397/2017 and 398/2017 are filed by the claimants, dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the Reference Court.
2. We have heard Smt.N.Sudhadevi, learned Special Government Pleader (Land Acquisition) appearing for the State of Kerala, Sri.K.A.Salil Narayanan, the learned Counsel appearing for the :-4-:
appellants in L.A.A.Nos.701/2013,702/2013,692/2013,693/2013 and 694/2013, Sri.R.Bindu (Sasthamangalam), the learned counsel appearing for the appellants in L.A.A.No.344/2016, Sri.Vinod Singh Cherian, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants in L.A.A.Nos.397/2017 and 398/2017, Sri.A.V.M.Salahudin, the learned counsel appearing for the cross objector in C.O.No.121/2014 in L.A.A.No.335/2014 and Sri.V.N.Ramesan Nambisan, the learned counsel appearing for the cross objectors in C.O.No.148/2022 in L.A.A.No.454/2014 and C.O.17/2022 in L.A.A.No.429/2014.
3. LAA No.815 of 2014 is treated as the main case. These cases have come up in batches totaling to 162 appeals including cross objections. The properties involved in all these appeals arise out of the same notification and are adjacent properties, acquired for the very same purpose. Hence we have heard the appeals together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. LAA No.815/2014 (LAR No.82/2011) is treated as the leading case and the evidence in this case consists of oral testimony of AW1, Exts. A1 to A3, Ext.R1 to R6 and Ext.X1 and X2.
:-5-:
4. Properties in Sy.Nos.19/9,19/11,19/13,19/15,19/17,19/19, 19/21,20/5,20/7,20/9,20/12,23/15,23/16,23/18,23/22,23/26,122/4,122/5, 213/4,213/7,214/4,214/14,159/4,194/2,226/5,230/8,230/10,230/11,232/ 5,234/6,234/8,234/9,234/11, 234/12, 234/13, 234/14, 236/9, 328/11,328/13,328/17
