Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, SHAJI P.CHALY, J
V.SUKUMARI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appellant seeks re-evaluation of compensation based on adjacent land awards, arguing that previous judgments affect her case. (Para 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. limitation on applications under section 28a is strict; courts cannot extend this period on equitable grounds. (Para 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 3. the learned judge's ruling confirms dismissal based on strict application of statutory timelines, reinforcing existing legal principles. (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
The petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 32616 of 2017 has filed this appeal challenging the judgment of a learned single Judge dated 29.01.2019, whereby the following reliefs sought for in the writ petition were declined:
1. Issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate writ, order or direction calling for records leading to Ext.P7 order and to quash the same;
2. Issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate order or direction setting aside Ext.P7 order and to direct the 4th respondent to consider Ext.P5 application made under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on merits based on Ext.P8 judgment.
2. The subject matter arises under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (‘Act, 1894’ for short). The learned single Judge,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
