SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 30888

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
VIDYA RAMASWAMY, – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA, – Respondent


Advocates:
SMT.MINI GOPINATH, CGC K.A.SALIL NARAYANAN -SC NHAI SRI.K.HANIL KUMAR – SPL GP SRI.P.VIJAYA KUMAR - ASG

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 16th day of September, 2021 The coalescing interplay of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the “RFCTLARR Act” for short), and National Highway Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the 'NH Act' for short), in computation of the compensation payable, consequent to acquisition of property by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI), is presented in the facts of this case; and this being an aspect which is not often correctly understood by the owners/claimants of the acquired properties, requires to be notified in public domain through a declaration of this Court.

2. Very often, parties who have suffered acquisition, approach this Court apprehending that they will be subjected to a raw deal in computation of the compensation eligible to them, because it is likely to be done under the NHAI Act and not under the “RFCTLARR Act” . This, however, appears to be misplaced, as I will presently explain in this judgment, after placing on record an apercus of the constitutive facts involved.

3. The petitioners are stated to be the owners of certain properties whic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top