SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 35710

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN THURSDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 17TH POUSHA, 1942 OP(C).No.1760 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER IN OS 270/2004 DATED 08-10-2020 OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPPALAM PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5: 1 KUNHAMINA, AGED 66 YEARS W/O. LATE MOHAMMADALI HAJI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

2 MUKHARI FIROZ, AGED 50 YEARS S/O. LATE MOHAMMADALI HAJI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

3 NOUSHAD, AGED 46 YEARS S/O. LATE MOHAMMADALI HAJI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

4 ABDUL NASAR, AGED 40 YEARS S/O. LATE MOHAMMADALI HAJI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

5 ANWAR SADATH, AGED 40 YEARS S/O. LATE MOHAMMADALI HAJI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.

SRI.P.JAYARAM SHRI. GIGI PAPPACHAN SHRI.AKHIL P RESPONDENTS:

1 T.K.SREENIVASAN, AGED 85 YEARS S/O. LATE T. S. KRISHANA IYER, THANIPPATTA MADATHIL, OTTAPALAM AMSOM, ARIYOOR THEKKMURI DESOM, OTTAPALAM P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679 101.

2 SAKKEER HUSSAIN, AGED 43 YEARS S/O. LATE MOHAMMADALI HAJI, 7TH CROSS ROAD, CHANGAPUZHA NAGAR P. O., KOCHI -33.

3 ASMA BEEBI, AGED 51 YEARS W/O. N. A. BASHEER AHAMMED, ASMABI MANZIL, GODOWN ROAD, EDAPPALLI TOLL P. O., KOCHI - 24.

4 SHAKKEELA, AGED 42 YEARS W/O. BAVA MOHAMMED, KOTTUKKAL HOUSE, KANJIRAKKODE P. O., VADAKKAMCHERI, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 582.

5 RUKKIYA, AGED 65 YEARS D/O. LATE MUKHARI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P.

O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679 301.

6 AMINA, AGED 58 YEARS D/O. LATE MUKHARI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P.

O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679 301.

7 SULAIMAN, AGED 56 YEARS S/O. LATE MUKHARI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P.

O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679 301.

8 MOHHAMMED SUDHEER, AGED 38 YEARS S/O. LATE MOHAMMADALI HAJI, KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679 301.

9 SHERIF HUSSAIN, AGED 50 YEARS S/O. LATE PATHUMMA @ MUTHU, D/O. LATE MUKHARI, KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT -

679 301.

10 NAZEER HUSSAIN, AGED 49 YEARS S/O. LATE PATHUMMA @ MUTHU, D/O. LATE MUKHARI, KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT -

679 301.

11 ISHAK HUSSAIN, AGED 47 YEARS S/O. LATE PATHUMMA @ MUTHU, D/O. LATE MUKHARI, KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT -

679 301.

12 YAKOOB HUSSAIN, AGED 47 YEARS S/O. LATE PATHUMMA @ MUTHU, D/O. LATE MUKHARI, KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT -

679 301.

13 SABITH HUSSAIN, AGED 47 YEARS S/O. LATE PATHUMMA @ MUTHU, D/O. LATE MUKHARI, KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT -

679 301.

14 SIDHIQ HUSSAIN, AGED 47 YEARS S/O. LATE PATHUMMA @ MUTHU, D/O. LATE MUKHARI, KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT -

679 301.

15 AFSAL HUSSAIN, AGED 47 YEARS S/O. LATE PATHUMMA @ MUTHU, D/O. LATE MUKHARI, KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT -

679 301.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.SHYAM THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Sathish Ninan, J.

==============================

O.P.(C) No.1760 of 2020 ==========================

Dated this the 07th day of January, 2021

Advocates:
['P JAYARAM', '', 'SHRI GIGI PAPPACHAN', 'SHRI AKHIL P', 'SRI S SHYAM']

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the original petition without prejudice to his rights to file an appeal against the order impugned in terms of Order 43 Rule 1 CPC. Permission granted. Original petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Sathish Ninan, Judge

vdv

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY DEFENDANTS 1 TO 3, 5 AND 6 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT AND PLANS DATED

14.10.2008 FILED BY ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER IN I.A.NO.2431/2006 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.01.2013 IN I.A.NO.3187/2012 AND I.A.NO.3188/2012 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM REMITTING THE COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND PLAN.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT AND PLAN DATED

20.02.2015 FILED BY ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER IN I.A.NO.3188/2012 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE DEFENDANTS IN I.A.NO.3357/2015 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM TO REMIT EXHIBIT P5 REPORT AND PLAN OF THE COMMISSIONER.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER STATEMENT FILED ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF IN I.A.NO.3357/2015 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM OPPOSING THE APPLICATION TO REMIT THE COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND PLAN.

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTIONS SUBMITTED AGAINST THE COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND PLAN DATED 28.02.2015 BY THE DEFENDANTS 1,2,3,5 AND 6.

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTIONS SUBMITTED AGAINST THE COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND PLAN DATED 28.02.2015 ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF.

EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.06.2020 IN I.A.NO.3357/2015 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM REMITTING THE REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER.

EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 21.07.2020 SHOWING PAYMENT OF COMMISSIONER'S BATHA IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM.

EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 17.07.2020 SHOWING PAYMENT OF BATHA TO DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT.

EXHIBIT P13 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW, I.A.NO.1438/2020 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM TO REVIEW EXHIBIT P10 ORDER FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF.

EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER STATEMENT FILED BY DEFENDANTS 1 TO 3, 5 AND 6 IN THE APPLICATION TO REVIEW FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF I.A.NO.1438/2020 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM.

EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 08.10.2020 IN I.A.NO.1438/2020 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top