SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9608

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.HARIPAL, J
MANOJ BENANCE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
ADVS.AJEESH S.BRITE, SHRI.ABHILASH AUGUSTINE, M.SMT.STEPHY JOSEPH

ORDER

The petitioner is the second accused in Crime No.

726/2018 of Paravoor Police Station, which was registered alleging offence punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 307, 427 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code .

2. The alleged incident had happened on 29.08.2018.

According to the learned counsel, it was the aftermath of a road rage, that the petitioner did not have any active role in the commission of the crime and that in the light of certain other incidents in which he was involved, he has been falsely implicated. He is a convict in a murder case and has other cases also to his credit.

3. According to the learned counsel, he has two small children to be looked after; they are being taken care by his mother, his wife has abandoned him, he is disabled even for applying for bail since he has not been granted bail in this case.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that he has five other cases starting from 2004 onwards and all are serious cases. Now he is a life convict undergoing imprisonment in Central Prison, Poojappura. The petitioner is the accused in this crime that had occurred in 2018. The investigation has been completed and charge she

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top