SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 8062

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V.ASHA, J
GOPE PANIKKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
RAJA P.KALIYATH, SC, SRI.JITHESH MENON GP, SMT.VINITHA B

J U D G M E N T

Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P7 communication received from the first respondent Bank according to which the probate of will is necessary for disbursing the amount due in the PPF account of the deceased Sister of the petitioner as well as respondents 3 and 4.

2. The case of the petitioner is that Ms.Usha Panikkar who is the sister of petitioner as well as respondents 3 and 4 was having a Public Provident Fund Account bearing No.10347456567 with the first respondent Bank. She expired on 21.05.2017. She had executed Ext.P4 will, which was registered, bequeathing the amount outstanding in the PPF account in favour of petitioner and respondents 3 and 4. It is stated that she was a Spinster and as per Ext.P3 legal heirship certificate, her mother Smt.Sarojini Panikkar is the only legal heir. Petitioner had approached the first respondent Bank submitting copy of Ext.P4 will and an affidavit Ext.P5 executed by the mother, declaring no objection in disbursement of the amount covered by the PPF account in accordance with the will, requesting for disbursement of the amount due under the PPF account. Pursuant to Ext.P6 representation, the Bank as per Ext.P7 letter informed the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top