Back
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
ALEYAMMA MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
SINDHU LALJI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the case and individuals involved. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioners argue against allegations made. (Para 2 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court addresses legal definitions and requirements for abetment. (Para 5 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court reviews intent and relationship between accused and victim. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. crl.mc allowed; no charges warranted. (Para 16) |
ORDER
The petitioners are the accused Nos.1 to 3 in SC No.321/2016 on the files of the Additional Sessions Court I, Alappuzha. The aforesaid Sessions case arises from Crime No.1256/2013 of Mavelikkara Police Station and the offences alleged against the petitioners are under Section 34 1, 323, 506(i), 305 read with of IPC .
2. This Crl.MC. is filed by the petitioners seeking for an order to quash all further proceedings in the above Sessions Case, on the ground that none of the offences alleged against them are made out, even if the entire allegations contained in Annexure B final report are accepted for its face value.
3. The facts of the case reveal an unfortunate event of suicide of a girl aged just 12 years. The prosecution case is that, the deceased student was studying at Bishop Moor Vidyapeedam School at
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
