ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
ALEYAMMA MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
SINDHU LALJI – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 7239 OF 2016 | SC 321/2016
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the case and individuals involved. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioners argue against allegations made. (Para 2 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court addresses legal definitions and requirements for abetment. (Para 5 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court reviews intent and relationship between accused and victim. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. crl.mc allowed; no charges warranted. (Para 16) |
ORDER
The petitioners are the accused Nos.1 to 3 in SC No.321/2016 on the files of the Additional Sessions Court I, Alappuzha. The aforesaid Sessions case arises from Crime No.1256/2013 of Mavelikkara Police Station and the offences alleged against the petitioners are under Section 34 1, 323, 506(i), 305 read with of IPC .
2. This Crl.MC. is filed by the petitioners seeking for an order to quash all further proceedings in the above Sessions Case, on the ground that none of the offences alleged against them are made out, even if the entire allegations contained in Annexure B final report are accepted for its face value.
3. The facts of the case reveal an unfortunate event of suicide of a girl aged just 12 years. The prosecution case is that, the deceased student was studying at Bishop Moor Vidyapeedam School at Mavelikkara in VIIth standard, where the petitioners are the teachers. The 1st petitioner is the Principal, the 2nd petitioner is the teacher and the 3rd petitioner is the Vice Principal of the said school. On 09.09.2013 while quarterly examination was being conducted at the school, the deceased child secretly communicated the answer of one the questions to another student (CW2). When this came to the notice of the 4th accused, who was the invigilator, she had taken the deceased student along with other three students who are CWs 2,3 and 4 to the office room of the 3rd accused. While so, the 3rd accused told the students that those who were caught for copying will be given zero marks. The children were directed by the 3rd accused to meet the Principal/1st accused on the next day and informed that they will be permitted to attend examination only thereafter. The next examination was on 11.09.2013 and when the students went to meet the Principal she was on leave that day. The students were permitted to write examination on that day and they again came to meet the Principal on the next day; on 12.09.2013. When they met the Principal, she forcibly removed the hair band of the deceased child and compelled her to tie her hair by using a ribbon. She has also said that all of the students will be issued with Transfer Certificate (T.C.) and in the report the fact of copying will be mentioned so that none of the students will get admission in any of the schools. They were all asked to bring their parents to the school on the next day. Unfortunately, the deceased child who got frightened due to the aforesaid incidents committed suicide immediately after reaching her house by setting herself fire by pouring kerosene. A dying declaration of the deceased student was also recorded, wherein the aforesaid incidents are mentioned. It is also stated by the deceased student that she attempted to commit suicide, as she was called to bring her parents. She also stated that the Principal threatened to hit her.
4. The aforesaid crime was registered on the basis of the same and after completing the investigation, Police filed Annexure B charge sheet. Now the matter is pending as S.C.No.321/2016 before the Additional Sessions Court I, Alappuzha.
5. Heard Sri.M.Revikrishnan, learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms.Digna David, learned counsel for the 1st respondent/the de facto complainant/mother of the deceased child and Sri.Aravind V. Mathew, learned Public Prosecutor for the State.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the none of the offences alleged against them are attracted. As regard to the offence under Section 305 of IPC is concerned, under no circumstance the acts alleged against the petitioners herein would indicate mens rea on their part which is one
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.