SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 8150

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Sathish Ninan, J
NISSY SAJU – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
SHRI.N.KRISHNA RAJA MAULI, GOVT. PLEADER SRI.PAUL ABRAHAM VAKKANAL

J U D G M E N T

According to the petitioner, the property belonging to him having an extent of 4.05 Ares in Sy. No.34/2-2-2 of Valakam village, though is a converted land, was erroneously included in the Data Bank maintained under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy land and Wetland Act and also in the revenue records. Seeking removal of the property from the data bank and also for change of user, the petitioner filed applications in Form Nos.5 and 6 of the Kerala Conservation of the Paddy land and Wetland Rules. The writ petition has been filed seeking a direction for consideration of the said applications.

2. During the pendency of the writ petition, the application in Form No.5, seeking deletion of the property from the data bank, has been granted as is evidenced by Ext.P7 order dated 21.04.2021. In view thereof, what remains for consideration is W. P. (C) No.2725 of 2021 Ext.P4 application filed in Form No.6.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider Ext.P4 application (Form No.6) on obtaining necessary reports and on verification of the relevant records, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of three months from

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top