SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9809

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Devan Ramachandran, J
S.D.RAVEENDRA PRASAD, – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA, – Respondent


Advocates:
R.PADMAKUMARI

JUDGMENT

The petitioners, who are stated to be senior citizens, have approached this Court seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent - Sub Registrar to complete registration of Ext.P3 Partition Deed, by permitting affixture of the signature of their son - Shri.L.R.Syam Prasad on it; and to allow the 1st petitioner to do so on his behalf, as his power of Attorney, on the strength of Ext.P2. They further pray that once the registration is thus completed, the competent among respondents 3 and 4 be directed to effect transfer of Registry of the respective shares of the property covered by Ext.P3 within a time frame to be fixed by this court.

2. The afore request of the petitioners as made by their learned counsel, Smt.R.Padmakumari, was answered by Smt.Resmitha Ramachandran - learned Government Pleader, pointing out that Ext.P3 is not a complete document since the afore mentioned Shri.L.R.Syam Prasad is yet to affix his signature thereon. She submitted that, therefore, the provisions of Section 24 of the Registration Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) would apply and that the petitioners will have to remit the requisite fine, as stipulated therein, for such purpos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top