SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 51822

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. B. Suresh Kumar, J
THANKAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Petitioner and the fifth respondent are siblings. Their mother Kalikutty is no more. Kalikutty held an item of property. It is stated by the petitioner that the fifth respondent has raised a claim over the property held by Kalikutty on the premise that she had executed a will on 13.07.1970 in respect of the property in his favour. According to the petitioner, Kalikutty died on 28.02.1970 and the will relied on by the fifth respondent is a forged one. She has therefore, instituted a suit as O.S.No.541 of 2018 before the Munsiff's Court, Chalakkudy for enforcing her rights over the property. In the meanwhile, since the death of Kalikutty was not registered, the petitioner obtained Ext.P2 non-availability certificate in terms of Rule 13 of the Kerala Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 (the Rules) and preferred an application seeking orders under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 (the Act) before the fourth respondent for registration of the death of Kalikutty. While so, the fifth respondent also applied for non-availability certificate in respect of the death of Kalikutty before the third

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top