HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.SOMARAJAN, J
A.PRASOBHAN – Appellant
Versus
THRIKKEDAUNKKARA BHAGAVATHY TEMPLE – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[RFA Nos.23/2021, 145/2021]
It is a case wherein a decree was passed based on the concession made by the parties relinquishing some of the reliefs included in the suit and by granting the other reliefs in a representative suit instituted with leave of court under Order I Rule 8 C.P.C.. A decree was passed based on the concession of parties without any evidence either documentary or oral against which the appellant, the aggrieved person, who is not a party to the proceedings came up challenging the decree mainly on the reason that it is a collusive one.
2. In a representative suit instituted with leave of court under Order I Rule 8 C.P.C., it is not permissible to pass a decree based on the concession made by the parties therein, unless there is compliance of mandate under Order I Rule 8(4) C.P.C. There cannot be any decree based on any settlement or concession arrived at by the parties in a representative suit instituted with the leave of court under Order I Rule 8 C.P.C. without a publication as mandated under Order I Rule 8(4) C.P.C. and there cannot be any relinquishment of claim or settlement thereof without such mandate.
Hence, the decree passed cannot be sustained.
Both
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.