Back
P. B. Suresh Kumar, C.S. Sudha, JJ
V.G.THANKAMANI – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over compensation for land acquisition. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. concerns about lack of notice for providing information to the expert. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. violation of natural justice due to arbitrator's non-neutrality. (Para 11 , 13) |
| 4. proceedings conduct must uphold principles of fairness. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT
P.B.Suresh Kumar, J.
This appeal is directed against the order in O.P. (Arbitration) No.134 of 2012 dated 18.12.2015 on the files of the Additional District Judge, North Paravur. Petitioners 3 to 5 and 7 to 27 in the proceedings are the appellants.
2. The appellants held lands abutting National Highway-47. 347 square meters (0.0347 hectares) of land held by the appellants in Survey No.2426/110 of Aluva West Village was acquired by the second respondent, the competent authority under the National Highways Act, 1956 (the Highways Act) for widening National Highway-47. Though the appellants claimed a sum of Rs.8 lakhs per cent, land value was fixed by the second respondent for the purpose of granting compensation to the appellants only at Rs.5,88,100/- per Are. There were various structures in the acquired land and the value of the same was fixed for the purpose of gran
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
