SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 27094

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N. NAGARESH, J
PRASEED NARAYANAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB REGISTRAR (MARRIAGE OFFICER) – Respondent


Advocates:
K.ANILA

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 8th day of December, 2021 The petitioner is before this Court seeking to command the respondents to act upon Ext.P2 application within a time limit and to declare that the petitioner is entitled to have the name changed from “Praseed Narayanan” to “Praseed Narayanan Nair” in the records, including Ext.P1 maintained with the respondents.

2. The petitioner’s name originally was “Praseed Narayanan”. The petitioner effected change in the name as “Praseed Narayanan Nair” as per Ext.P6 Gazette Notification. The petitioner thereafter approached the 2nd respondent to make corrections in Ext.P1 Certificate of Marriage. The 1st respondent Sub Registrar declined the application submitted by the petitioner as per Ext.P9, stating that a Marriage Officer has no authority to make any changes in the Certificate of Marriage after 30 days.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with all bonafide, the petitioner has changed his name and the Village Officer has issued Ext.P7 evidencing that “Praseed Narayanan” and “Praseed Narayanan Nair” is one and the same person. In the circumstances, unless the Certificate of Marriage is corrected, the petitioner will be put to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top