SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 25578

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Devan Ramachandran, J
NISANTH.S – Appellant
Versus
THE TAHASILDAR – Respondent


Advocates:
JACOB SEBASTIAN, SRI.K.V.WINSTON, SMT.ANU JACOB

JUDGMENT

The petitioners say that they are the owners of 10 cents of land each, comprised of in old Sy.No.62/7 of Pudunagaram Village, Palakkad and have produced Exts.P1, P3, P4 and P6 in substantiation.

2. The petitioners say that even though they were allowed to remit land tax on the properties in question in the past, as is evident from Exts.P2 and P5, they have now been denied permission to do so by the respondents, without citing any cogent reason. They, therefore, pray that the competent among respondents 1 and 2 be directed to allow them to pay tax on the properties covered by their title deeds, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

3. The afore submissions of Sri.Aboobacker Siddique – learned counsel for the petitioners, were answered by the learned Senior Government Pleader – Sri.Ashwin Sethumadhavan, saying that respondents 1 and 2 are incapacitated from allowing the petitioners to remit the land tax on their properties, because it is abutting or lying adjacent to certain properties which have already been determined as being 'surplus land', under the Kerala Land Reforms Act (KLR Act). He submitted that, therefore, unless there is a proper investigation to the ext

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top