SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 51542

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V.ASHA, J
SREEDEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are aggrieved by the dangerous position of their residential building, because of the lie of the adjacent properties in northern and eastern boundaries in a higher level stating that it is likely to fall down on their house endangering the life of the petitioners. Petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking a direction to respondents 2 to 5 to permit them to remove the soil from the eastern and northern side of their residential building, pointing out that they had already submitted complaints before the RDO and

Exts.P5 to P7 reports were already furnished recommending removal of soil from the adjacent properties.

2. The learned Government Pleader submitted that since soil has to be removed permission from the Geologist is necessary. It is also stated that the RDO had called for a report from the Panchayath and the same has not been received.

3. As the petitioners have been before the authorities for the last several years pointing out the dangerous condition in which the residential building is situated, there shall be a direction to the Revenue Divisional Officer to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top