HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V.ASHA, J
FIDA ASHRAF. K – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner, who is a second year MBBS Student, is aggrieved by the rejection of her application for educational loan.
2. It is stated that the petitioner passed SSLC as well as the Higher Secondary Examination with very high marks with A+ Grade in all the subjects and obtained admission for MBBS in the State merit quota in the 3 rd respondent College. As the petitioner's family found it difficult to remit the fee for the MBBS course, she submitted Ext.P6 application for educational loan, with her father as the co- applicant. In the application property in the name of her father having an extent of 6.070 Ares along with the residential house was offered as security. However the second respondent did not take any positive action though it was assured that it would be processed and loan would be sanctioned. The petitioner points out that it is only because of
Ext.P9 proceedings before the Munsiff Court in execution proceedings in PLP No.21001 of 2016 that the respondents did not sanction the loan. It is stated that the said proceedings relates to a case where her father stood as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.